Issues to Follow In 2006: Net Neutrality
Posted on December 29, 2005 at 4:37 PM in @earthlink

Note: The below is an archived entry from Earthling, formerly EarthLink's official blog. The blog itself has been decommissioned and is no longer updated, and comments are trackbacks are no longer accepted.

When you pay your internet access bill each month, what exactly does that buy you?

Up until now, it has generally been up to you and the limits of your home technology to decide what products and services you want to use out on the internet. The service agreement you sign with your provider usually says that you can't use your connection to break laws (which may include downloading movies and music from peer-to-peer networks). But other than that, as far as your provider is concerned, internet traffic is internet traffic. Whether it is a packet of voice data, a piece of a music file, or a set of web page requests, it all looks the same as it flows through the network. In this sense, what kind of traffic you send and receive has been pretty much left up to you.

That all could change quickly. It's an issue worth looking out for in the coming year. The term "network neutrality" refers to the idea that your ticket to the internet should remain an open pathway through which you should be able to send and receive any type of data you choose.

One of the first services to test the question of network neutrality has been VOIP (Voice Over IP).

VOIP (Voice Over IP) services allow you to make standard telephone calls through an adapter via your Internet Service Provider. EarthLink offers a VOIP service called TrueVoice, and there are several others in the market including Vonage.

As long as you already have high-speed internet service like DSL or Cable, you pay around $15-$30 extra a month for the ability to make local and long-distance phone calls with a regular landline telephone through your internet connection.

These services are sold separately from your internet connection. So even if you are not an EarthLink DSL or Cable customer, for example, you can use TrueVoice on your internet connection and route the service through your internet service provider.

That much is probably not news to most people.

But in some countries, ISP's have used special software to detect VOIP phone traffic through the internet and block it when it comes from certain networks. ArsTechnica writer Ken Fisher has been following this issue closely, and he reports this practice occuring in places like Saudi Arabia, Egypt, and Germany.

Although to my knowledge no U.S. ISP is yet blocking VOIP service, that could change soon. In a Business Week interview, SBC's CEO Ed Whitacre has said that he is seeking a way to make extra money on customers who use non-SBC VOIP services through their internet connection:

"Now what they would like to do is use my pipes free, but I ain't going to let them do that because we have spent this capital and we have to have a return on it. So there's going to have to be some mechanism for these people who use these pipes to pay for the portion they're using. Why should they be allowed to use my pipes?"

It's not clear when he's talking about "these people" if he means the VOIP provider services or the customers, but the implication is clear.

I've put this in the "@earthlink" category because as both an ISP and a VOIP provider, we're right in the middle of this mess. EarthLink believes in upholding the value of network neutrality. As a member of the VON coalition we're assisting in developing legislation to keep network traffic neutral. In a statement before the House Committee on Energy and Commerce, EarthLink's Executive Vice President of Public Policy Chris Putala explained:

"..Once a consumer has purchased the right to use the express lane, they should be able to use that express lane for ALL applications, not just those their BITS provider would prefer. Network owners must not be allowed to favor their own customers or applications. " (note: this is from an unofficial transcript, as the official transcript is not yet available)

There was some good news this week on the net neutrality front, as the FTC made a statement indicating that ISP's should not block internet traffic based on its content. I can't find the actual text of the statement yet, but here's the article where I saw the reference.

Comments

You made this complicated subject very understandable. Earthlink has the right idea.

Earthlink is taking absolutely the right position, as has my ISP Speakeasy. I have the impression that most of the independent ISPs have the right idea. However, I do fear that the independents will be eventually crushed by the rapacious telcos and cable companies...

Bell South is also looking at charging or blocking some content types. See http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story.asp?siteid=mktw&dist=morenews&guid=%7B02432D2D%2D1EE0%2D4037%2DA15F%2D54B748D6CF26%7D

They compare themselves to a "shipping company" and want to charge for shipping the content.

Comments and trackbacks are now closed.

This is an archive of Earthling, formerly EarthLink's official blog.
EarthLink Product Blog Directory
Details
enter your e-mail address below to get each blog entry in your inbox:

 

(delivered by FeedBurner)

-->
Five Latest Entries

© 2007 EarthLink, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

EarthLink encourages comments from readers. Please keep comments on topic, clean and constructive.
We reserve the right to delete any comments for any reason.