www.earthlink.net myEarthLink myVoice My Account Support webmail.earthlink.net

« Take the Web Mail Survey     |   Back to MAIN   |     Web Mail 5.60 Released April 11 »

When messages you want to receive are flagged as spam - 03/29/08

From: Email Guy
Subject:       When messages you want to receive are flagged as spam
Date: March 29, 2008 10:53 AM
Permalink   |   Post Comment

Some users have reported that messages they want to receive in their Inbox are sometimes being flagged as spam and going to the Known Spam folder. This is called a "false positive" when our spam filters mark a message as spam but you don't consider it to be spam and want it to be delivered. There are several reasons this can happen. I'll describe some of those and then describe a solution you can use to help us reduce the number of false positives.

Some common causes of false positives are:

  • You have signed up for a mailing list or announcements from a bulk email sender (a company or organization), but many other users are reporting messages from that sender as spam using the "This Is Spam" button in Web Mail. When a sender has a bad reputation as reported by thousands of users, this can result in their messages being filtered for all users.

  • A person that you correspond with may have a compromised computer that has become infected with a virus created by a spammer, and their computer is sending out thousands of messages unknown to that user. When that happens, that sender can get listed as a spammer and all their messages might start getting flagged as spam.

  • In a few cases, regular message correspondence that is not spam might be incorrectly flagged because it has similarities to actual spam and gets caught by a filter. Your reports help to refine the filters to be more accurate.


If messages that you want to receive are being flagged as spam, please follow these steps and we'll try to get it cleared up:

  1. In your spamBlocker settings, make sure the setting for "Delete Known spam immediately" is turned off. That allows you to save and view the messages that were marked as spam. To get to the setting, click on spamBlocker / Settings.

  2. When you get a message in the Known Spam folder that should not be there, select the message (or view it) and click the button for "This Is Not Spam". That sends us a report of the problem.

  3. If after a couple of days, your report using "This Is Not Spam" did not seem to have an effect and the problem persists, then we'd like you to take an extra step to help us investigate it. Report the lastest false positive using "This Is Not Spam" and then also write a new message to us at falsepositivereport@earthlink.net. Provide us with the sender address for the messages that are still being caught in Known Spam, and also the Subject line that was in the last message you reported. This information will help us locate the report for investigation. Make sure you send it from the mailbox where the problem occurred.


If the problem persists, one drastic solution is to turn the spamBlocker level to Off. If you don't get much spam in your mailbox, that might be a workable temporary solution. Doing that will cause all messages to go to your Inbox and nothing will get filtered.

Aside from EarthLink spam filtering, your own personal Blocked Sender List can also block messages from being delivered. Unlike the spamBlocker filter, which puts messages identified as spam into your Known Spam folder for your review, your personal Blocked Sender List prevents delivery entirely, and messages you block that way cannot be recovered. If you have inadvertently blocked a sender, you can edit your block list by clicking on spamBlocker / Blocked Sender List (or Preferences / Blocked Sender List). Before reporting a false positive as described above, please make sure you aren't blocking the messages yourself.

One last thing - if you are using spamBlocker on the High setting, then messages from senders not in your Address Book are delivered to the Suspect Email folder. This is completely separate from the spam filtering that puts messages in Known Spam, so don't confuse the two and only use the steps above when messages are delivered to the Known Spam folder.

Discussion


    « Previous   |   Showing Comments 26-27 of 27


Posted by: G Bryan   |   August 4, 2008 11:19 PM    |   (26)

Two comments:

1. My most recent "false positive" stats (as of a few minutes ago):

54 messages flagged as "known spam." 13 of those messages are legitimate mail (false positive). Thus, the false positive rate is close to 25%.

2. I continue to be concerned about the unannounced decision to greatly truncate the storage capacity of "Known Spam." I pay for an extra 200 MB of mailbox size. Seems to me that should carry over into the "Known Spam" capacity as well. 100 messages of backlog isn't very much. With the ridiculously high false positive rate, there can be no doubt that many legitimate messages are likely to disappear forever if I don't check the "Known Spam" listings at least a couple of times a day.

Back in the BrightMail days, the "caught spam" capacity was significantly higher.

I can't believe that the typical Earthlink customer realizes how much legitimate e-mail is being systematically thrown away by Earthlink each day.

GLB

We're working on this, but to clarify, this almost always only occurs with bulk emailers that are frequently reported as spam by other users, not with personal email correspondence. I understand in your case it is bad, but you are overstating the general problem. That said, we made changes this week that are going to improve that steadily over the next few weeks, and there is another change coming next month that should almost eliminate the trouble. Thanks for your patience.

Email Guy


Posted by: G Bryan   |   August 26, 2008 5:40 PM    |   (27)

[W]e made changes this week that are going to improve that steadily over the next few weeks, and there is another change coming next month that should almost eliminate the trouble. Thanks for your patience.

Not a moment too soon for those changes, in my opinion. I haven't seen any significant difference so far, but it's all so unpredictable -- in general, mail from the very same senders gets through one time and gets blocked another. There's no obvious pattern to it, so it's hard to detect any change.

Of course, genuine whitelisting would solve the problem once and for all. :)

GLB

Yes, after the first instance and you whitelisted the sender. I really want to have this feature, but it is not trivial for us to provide and I don't know yet when I can get it. But most false positives should go away soon from the other things we are doing.

Email Guy




    « Previous   |   Showing Comments 26-27 of 27

Post a comment Back to MAIN

Please read the Ground Rules before submitting comments.

Please check the FAQ (Frequently Asked Questions) and try the Search feature before posting a new question. If your question is answered in the FAQ or in a recent article on the front page, it might not get published.



(All blogs get tons of automated spam from robots, so unless you answer this question, your comment will automatically be considered spam and won't be posted. Type human, one word, all lower-case letters.)

1.27